Jürg Schneider

From the Republic of Korea: Stories on „Tong-Il“ Rice and „Maroo“ Potato

I recently watched “Potato Lab”, a K-drama that features Mi-Kyung, the female protagonist. She is a passionate potato researcher who develops, with her team, Maroo, a (fictitious) new domestic potato variety. The story is set at a national-style agricultural research institute and shows actual Korean potato breeding work - particularly interesting for me who has worked with plant breeders in a past function.

In Korea, the rural popu­la­ti­on has declined from 72% (1960) of the total popu­la­ti­on to just 17% (2010). In this deve­lo­p­ment, a high yiel­ding rice varie­ty named „Tong-Il“ has play­ed a pro­mi­nent role in the 1970s, but more on this below.

„Maroo“, on the other hand, is a fic­ti­tious dome­stic pota­to varie­ty which appears pro­min­ent­ly in a K‑Drama series cal­led the “Pota­to Lab”, which I recent­ly watched.

The sto­ry is set in a natio­nal-style agri­cul­tu­ral rese­arch insti­tu­te and shows actu­al Kore­an pota­to bree­ding work – of spe­cial inte­rest to me who has work­ed with plant bree­ders in a past func­tion. We are also offe­red a glim­pse into the rural dimen­si­on of life in modern Korea, as well as con­vey­ing a sen­se of the pains­ta­king work of bree­ding pota­to varie­ties that are high-yiel­ding and adapt­ed to local con­di­ti­ons.

The series fea­tures Mi-Kyung, as the fema­le prot­ago­nist. She is a pas­sio­na­te pota­to rese­ar­cher who wants to deve­lop a new varie­ty that is as good or bet­ter than the estab­lished varie­ty “Mar­shall”. In this pro­cess, she hits various bureau­cra­tic and busi­ness-rela­ted obs­ta­cles. This mir­rors the ten­si­on bet­ween Mi-Kyung and the male prot­ago­nist So Baek-Ho, who is in char­ge of orga­nizatio­nal inno­va­ti­on at the big retail com­pa­ny Won­han, and sent to the „Pota­to Lab“ on an effi­ci­en­cy mis­si­on.

The­re are other K‑dramas that build on the ten­si­on bet­ween the urban and the rural pre­sent. This should not sur­pri­se, as the urba­nizati­on of Korea is rather recent. In the 1950s, the coun­try was an agra­ri­an socie­ty, yet food pro­duc­tion fell short of its needs. From 1954 to 1976 the US pro­vi­ded food aid, main­ly in the form of wheat and bar­ley. The avera­ge annu­al per capi­ta inco­me in 1961 was USD 72.

Bet­ween 1961 and 1979, the Repu­blic of Korea was what can be cal­led a “deve­lo­p­men­tal dic­ta­tor­ship”: Pre­si­dent Park Chung-Hee, a gene­ral, strong-han­dedly ruled the coun­try aiming to put it on the path to indu­stria­lizati­on and export-ori­en­ted eco­no­mic growth.

Incre­a­sing food pro­duc­tion was a prio­ri­ty tar­get. The govern­ment drew up a seven-year plan (1964−1971) with mea­su­res tar­ge­ting grain pro­duc­tion, land reform, cre­dit assi­stance for far­mers, sta­te pri­ce con­trols on the stap­le foods rice and bar­ley, and sub­si­di­zed mini­mum purcha­se pri­ces for pro­du­cers. To boost rice pro­duc­tion, it laun­ched “Tong-Il,” a new high-yiel­ding varie­ty.

But not just pro­duc­tion were to chan­ge, but also the mind­set of the rural popu­la­ti­on, so that it would gra­du­al­ly work its way up to a sta­te of self-reli­ance and no lon­ger depend on exter­nal assi­stance. In 1971, Park Chung-Hee laun­ched Sae­maul Undong, the “New Vil­la­ge Move­ment”. Sae­maul Undong was both a mate­ri­al – cement for vil­la­ge roads and infras­truc­tu­re was pro­vi­ded – and a spi­ri­tu­al approach – vil­la­ge gathe­rings that dis­cus­sed self-help pro­jects. It gave more space to grass­roots initia­ti­ves than had pre­vious­ly been the case. Not least, the best vil­la­ges were award­ed pri­zes by the pre­si­dent hims­elf.

For almost 20 years, the “move­ment” was acti­ve in rural are­as. As a govern­ment pro­gram, it expi­red in 2000 and has sin­ce mor­phed into a know­ledge cen­ter desi­gned to pro­mo­te Kore­an deve­lo­p­ment expe­ri­ence around the glo­be. [1]


[1] OECD (2016). A new rural deve­lo­p­ment para­digm. This stu­dy by the OECD’s Deve­lo­p­ment Cent­re descri­bes the Kore­an deve­lo­p­ment case in chap­ter 5. Pro­du­ced with the sup­port of the Kore­an Mini­stry of For­eign Affairs, it tries to draw les­sons from Korea and five other count­ries (Tan­z­a­nia, Côte d’I­voi­re, Viet­nam, Chi­na, Thai­land), in order to extra­ct ele­ments for a “new para­digm” for rural deve­lo­p­ment.