Jürg Schneider

Research Projects; Policy and Program Work

Indonesian „Singers of Tales“ – the 1988 recordings

2026–2027

This small pro­ject aims at making a „Guri­tan“ sto­ry from the high­lands of Suma­tra recor­ded in 1988 acces­si­ble to tho­se inte­re­sted in oral tra­di­ti­ons of Indo­ne­sia and the world. „Guri­tan“ is an oral epic, often a heroic tale that is sung during an evening or late night gathe­ring. Until the late 20th cen­tu­ry, it was still prac­ti­ced as per­for­ma­ti­ve art form, though the sin­gers, or bards, were most­ly elder­ly men with no app­ren­ti­ces.

During the rese­arch pro­ject on „Bengku­lu mar­kets“, my fel­low rese­ar­cher Miche­le Gali­zia arran­ged for the­se recor­dings to be made. The pro­ject will (i) digi­ta­li­ze the con­tent of the­se recor­dings (made on then cus­to­ma­ry MC-tapes), (ii) pro­du­ce tran­scrip­ti­ons and (iii) pro­po­se some pos­si­ble lines of rese­arch.

To my know­ledge, no pri­or rese­arch exists on „Sin­gers of Tales“ in the tra­di­tio­nal­ly Rejang-spea­king area of Curup, a medi­um-sized town in the high­lands of Bengku­lu pro­vin­ce. Howe­ver, for the Pase­­mah-spea­king area south of Curup, the­re is the work of Wil­liam Coll­ins (1998), „The Guri­tan of Radin Sua­ne: A stu­dy of the Bese­meh oral epic from South Suma­tra“, which will be an important refe­rence.

Never heard about the Austronesian language family? Read about Renward Brandstetter (1860−1942)

For my rese­arch in Indo­ne­sia, I had to beco­me flu­ent in Indo­ne­si­an. In 2007, I redis­co­ver­ed the wri­tin­gs of Ren­ward Brand­stet­ter. That was short­ly befo­re his 150th bir­th­day, coming up in 2010. I mana­ged to mobi­li­ze a group of for­mer col­le­agues and rese­ar­chers for a con­fe­rence. The objec­ti­ve was to revi­sit Brandstetter’s work which had given the noti­on of “Aus­tro­ne­si­an lan­guages” a syste­ma­tic depth not rea­ched befo­re.

The con­fe­rence papers were edi­ted by Robert Blust and mys­elf under the tit­le “A world of words” (2012, out of print).  For tho­se who read Ger­man, the­re is a rela­ted book­let edi­ted by Iwar Wer­len and published by the Swiss Aca­de­my of the Social Sci­en­ces, “Ren­ward Brand­stet­ter (1860−1942). Bei­trä­ge zum 150. Geburts­tag des Schwei­zer Dia­lek­to­lo­gen und Erfor­schers der aus­tro­ne­si­schen Spra­chen und Lite­ra­tu­ren.» This volu­me also con­ta­ins a tran­script of his auto­bio­gra­phy.

In the years that fol­lo­wed I wro­te a bio­gra­phy on Brand­stet­ter that takes a com­pre­hen­si­ve approach to his life and idio­syn­cra­tic work. The book (in Ger­man) was published in 2019 by Har­ras­so­witz, Wies­ba­den.

Homegardens and agro-biodiversity

All over the world, home­gar­dens are spaces den­se­ly plan­ted with crops that sup­p­ly food to hou­se­holds and often ser­ve to main­tain signi­fi­cant agro-bio­­­di­­ver­­­si­­ty in situ. The­se are also idea places to stu­dy the prin­ci­ples of agro-eco­­lo­­gy, an idea ela­bo­ra­ted on the exam­p­le of the Java­ne­se home­gar­den by Otto Soe­mar­wo­to in 1975. I had the pri­vi­le­ge to advi­se on a glo­bal pro­gram – led by IPGRI’s Pablo Eyza­guir­re – that brought tog­e­ther agri­cul­tu­ral rese­ar­chers from many count­ries with the aim to bet­ter under­stand home­gar­dens. One of the fruits of that rese­arch was a book edi­ted by Pablo and Olga Lina­res and published by Smit­h­so­ni­an, to which I con­tri­bu­ted a chap­ter.

The conservation of local sweet potato varieties in Indonesia, and the documentation of farmers’ knowledge about their varieties

When the CBD was adopted at the Rio Con­fe­rence on SD in 1992, it pro­vi­ded an impe­tus to (applied) rese­arch on local or indi­ge­nous know­ledge. The con­ser­va­ti­on of local sweet pota­to varie­ties in Indo­ne­sia, and the docu­men­ta­ti­on of far­mers’ know­ledge about their varie­ties was the objec­ti­ve of a rese­arch pro­ject initia­ted by CIP (Inter­na­tio­nal Pota­to Cen­ter, Lima), sup­port­ed by SDC and imple­men­ted by CIP’s regio­nal office in Bogor. As a social sci­en­tist with CIP, I set up the col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve pro­ject orga­nizati­on with Indo­ne­si­an agri­cul­tu­ral rese­arch insti­tu­ti­ons and uni­ver­si­ties. We built a metho­di­cal frame­work for the stu­dy and orga­ni­zed seve­ral plant coll­ec­tion mis­si­ons, inclu­ding two to West Papua.

For an over­view on sweet pota­to in the Papua high­lands, see CIP’s annu­al report 1994. (pp. 12–15). In CIP’s Pro­gramm report from 1997–98 my men­tor for this work, Gor­don Prain, talks in detail about „Far­mer main­ten­an­ce of sweet pota­to diver­si­ty in Asia“ (pp. 317–28). The chap­ter also sum­ma­ri­zes the fin­dings of our sweet pota­to rese­arch with far­mers in the West Papu­an high­lands.

Our rese­arch was embedded into CIP’s glo­bal work on sweet pota­to, and bene­fi­ted from exch­an­ge and coor­di­na­ti­on bet­ween agro­no­mists, plant bree­ders, and anthro­po­lo­gists. Most important: we lear­ned from far­mers how they mana­ged their agro­bio­di­ver­si­ty in situ – having built over time an impres­si­ve sweet pota­to varie­tal diver­si­ty as an eco­no­mic, social and eco­lo­gi­cal resour­ce.

People and markets. Economic integration in Bengkulu (Indonesia)

1987–1990

This lar­ge rese­arch pro­ject – fun­ded by the Swiss Natio­nal Sci­ence Foun­da­ti­on – sup­port­ed five Ph.D. stu­dents. Under the gui­dance of Prof. Wolf­gang Mar­schall, the group car­ri­ed out joint rese­arch into the mar­ket system of a high­land regi­on in Suma­tra, fol­lo­wed by indi­vi­du­al rese­arch on spe­ci­fic aspects of eco­no­mic deve­lo­p­ment and poli­ti­cal inte­gra­ti­on in that area. The results were published in a series of five mono­graphs.

My rese­arch focu­sed on the trans­for­ma­ti­on of rice agri­cul­tu­re through inten­si­fi­ca­ti­on pro­grams in the 1970s and 1980s, and its impact on the far­ming system and far­ming hou­se­holds (Ph.D. the­sis, published in 1995, “From Upland to Irri­ga­ted Rice”, Rei­mer, Ber­lin).

As a group and indi­vi­du­al­ly, we came out of this mul­ti-year rese­arch effort much enri­ched, pro­fes­sio­nal­ly and per­so­nal­ly. As the say­ing goes: “anthro­po­lo­gists are made during their fieldwork”.

Proto-statistical historical sources in the Canton of Berne

1980–1984

This rese­arch pro­ject was fun­ded by the Swiss Natio­nal Sci­ence Foun­da­ti­on and car­ri­ed out by col­la­bo­ra­tors of the Histo­ri­cal Insti­tu­te, Uni­ver­si­ty of Ber­ne under Prof. Bea­trix Mes­mer. We work­ed both at the cen­tral histo­ri­cal archi­ves of the Can­ton of Ber­ne, as well as in the district archi­ves to estab­lish an inven­tors of ear­ly sta­tis­ti­cal sources (16th – ear­ly 19th cen­tu­ries) befo­re modern cen­tra­li­zed sta­tis­tics were estab­lished (which was in the first half of the 19th cen­tu­ry, in most Euro­pean sta­tes). Con­tri­bu­ting to con­tem­po­ra­ry rese­arch – local histo­ries, quan­ti­ta­ti­ve methods.

It was important to get into the depth of the­se source mate­ri­als and to see how the ear­ly modern sta­te, in the case of Ber­ne, was coun­ting – popu­la­ti­on, hou­se­holds, epi­de­mics etc.

Policy and program work

Cohesion / Swiss contribution

Cohe­si­on poli­cy is part of the EU’s approach to redu­ce dis­pa­ri­ties – in eco­no­mic and social terms – bet­ween regi­ons. Sin­ce 2005, Switz­er­land con­tri­bu­tes to EU cohe­si­on with fun­ding from a sepa­ra­te frame­work cre­dit imple­men­ted bila­te­ral­ly with sel­ec­ted mem­ber count­ries of the EU. A second peri­od of fun­ding run­ning from 2019–2029 is curr­ent­ly imple­men­ted in 13 count­ries, inclu­ding the Czech Repu­blic (CHF 76.9 mio) and Slo­va­kia (CHF 44.2 mio). I ser­ved for three years in our Embas­sies in Bra­tis­la­va and Pra­gue to set up the ope­ra­ti­ons. Our part­ner mini­stries deve­lo­ped pro­grams in sec­tors like health, envi­ron­ment or rese­arch, which I then stee­red through the appr­oval pro­cess. At the end of 2024, all seven pro­grams for the two count­ries had been for­mal­ly appro­ved and were rea­dy for imple­men­ta­ti­on.

OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and the international system

While we are curr­ent­ly see­ing a dis­rup­ti­on and defun­ding of inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on, or “aid” to use the clas­sic word, it is important to remem­ber that the deve­lo­p­ment coope­ra­ti­on and rele­vant poli­ci­es have evol­ved in a glo­bal­ly coor­di­na­ted way sin­ce 1960 when the DAC as estab­lished at OECD’s head­quar­ters in Paris. The DAC has play­ed an important role in estab­li­shing sta­tis­tics on aid, poli­cy stan­dards and a shared space for lear­ning and asses­sing the inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on system of fel­low DAC mem­ber sta­tes through “peer reviews”. For exam­p­le, during my time as a dele­ga­te for Switz­er­land to the DAC, our coun­try was – with the Net­her­lands – revie­w­ing the Czech Repu­blic. Peer reviews are very useful in asses­sing a sec­to­ral poli­cy of a coun­try, and they pro­vi­de recom­men­da­ti­ons on how to impro­ve or adjust poli­ci­es and insti­tu­tio­nal set-ups. It then depends on the govern­ment and agen­ci­es con­cer­ned to work on the recom­men­da­ti­ons, and show achie­ve­ments when the next review comes up.

The economic development co-operation program between Switzerland and Indonesia

2010–2014

The eco­no­mic deve­lo­p­ment co-ope­ra­ti­on pro­gram bet­ween Switz­er­land and Indo­ne­sia is part of Switzerland’s deve­lo­p­ment coope­ra­ti­on and is run­ning sin­ce 2010. I ser­ved as head of the coope­ra­ti­on office in our Jakar­ta Embas­sy from 2010–2014 to set up ope­ra­ti­ons and build the pro­gram from very few acti­vi­ties into an annu­al pro­gram of rough­ly 20 mil­li­on CHF. The pro­gram is now in its fifth four year pro­gram­me cycle (2025−2028).

In the chal­len­ging insti­tu­tio­nal and phy­si­cal envi­ron­ment of the Indo­ne­si­an capi­tal, the mul­ti­ple tasks of pro­gram­me iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on, coor­di­na­ti­on, manage­ment and net­wor­king nee­ded to be tack­led in a spi­rit of prio­ri­tizati­on, effi­ci­en­cy, and trust-buil­­ding with poten­ti­al part­ners.