Jürg Schneider

The conservation of local sweet potato varieties in Indonesia, and the documentation of farmers’ knowledge about their varieties

When the CBD was adopted at the Rio Con­fe­rence on SD in 1992, it pro­vi­ded an impe­tus to (applied) rese­arch on local or indi­ge­nous know­ledge.

The con­ser­va­ti­on of local sweet pota­to varie­ties in Indo­ne­sia, and the docu­men­ta­ti­on of far­mers’ know­ledge about their varie­ties was the objec­ti­ve of a rese­arch pro­ject initia­ted by CIP (Inter­na­tio­nal Pota­to Cen­ter, Lima), sup­port­ed by SDC and imple­men­ted by CIP’s regio­nal office in Bogor. As a social sci­en­tist with CIP, I set up the col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve pro­ject orga­nizati­on with Indo­ne­si­an agri­cul­tu­ral rese­arch insti­tu­ti­ons and uni­ver­si­ties. We built a metho­di­cal frame­work for the stu­dy and orga­ni­zed seve­ral plant coll­ec­tion mis­si­ons, inclu­ding two to West Papua.

For an over­view on sweet pota­to in the Papua high­lands, see CIP’s annu­al report 1994. (pp. 12–15). In CIP’s Pro­gramm report from 1997–98 my men­tor for this work, Gor­don Prain, talks in detail about „Far­mer main­ten­an­ce of sweet pota­to diver­si­ty in Asia“ (pp. 317–28). The chap­ter also sum­ma­ri­zes the fin­dings of our sweet pota­to rese­arch with far­mers in the West Papu­an high­lands.

Our rese­arch was embedded into CIP’s glo­bal work on sweet pota­to, and bene­fi­ted from exch­an­ge and coor­di­na­ti­on bet­ween agro­no­mists, plant bree­ders, and anthro­po­lo­gists. Most important: we lear­ned from far­mers how they mana­ged their agro­bio­di­ver­si­ty in situ – having built over time an impres­si­ve sweet pota­to varie­tal diver­si­ty as an eco­no­mic, social and eco­lo­gi­cal resour­ce.

Research Work