Jürg Schneider

The Informal Sector

In November 2025, British anthropologist Keith Hart died in Paris. He was 81 years old. Hart had many interests, but since it was him who introduced the dimension of economic “informality” into development policy debates, my commentary is a tribute to his original contribution, looking back sixty years when a field called “development economics” was still in its formative years.

In Novem­ber 2025, Bri­tish anthro­po­lo­gist Keith Hart died in Paris. He was 81 years old.

Hart had many inte­rests, but sin­ce it was him who intro­du­ced the dimen­si­on of eco­no­mic “infor­ma­li­ty” into deve­lo­p­ment poli­cy deba­tes, my com­men­ta­ry is a tri­bu­te to his ori­gi­nal con­tri­bu­ti­on, loo­king back six­ty years when a field cal­led “deve­lo­p­ment eco­no­mics” was still in its for­ma­ti­ve years.

1965, Gha­na: Keith Hart, Ph.D. stu­dent of Cam­bridge Uni­ver­si­ty, starts his PhD field rese­arch on rural-urban migra­ti­on. He spends two years, most­ly in Accra, and gets amp­le oppor­tu­ni­ties to stu­dy the eco­no­my of poor urban hou­se­holds.

1971, Sus­sex. Back in the U.K., Hart par­ti­ci­pa­tes at a deve­lo­p­ment con­fe­rence on “Urban unem­ployment in Afri­ca” at the “Insti­tu­te of Deve­lo­p­ment Stu­dies”. The­se were times when migra­ti­on to cities and urban unem­ployment was a big topic among deve­lo­p­ment eco­no­mists.

At the con­fe­rence, Hart deli­vers a paper on “Urban employment and infor­mal inco­me oppor­tu­ni­ties”, based on evi­dence from Gha­na – instru­men­tal for the stu­dy of the “infor­mal sec­tor”. His aim is essen­ti­al­ly to show that the urban poor are not unem­ployed – to the con­tra­ry, they were con­stant­ly loo­king for infor­mal inco­me oppor­tu­ni­ties.

The importance of this seems evi­dent now, but had remain­ed in the shadow of a then domi­nant focus on “unem­ployment”. Hart never concei­ved of the infor­mal eco­no­mic acti­vi­ties as a “sec­tor” – like manu­fac­tu­ring or agri­cul­tu­re. He insi­sted that for­mal and infor­mal dimen­si­ons of an eco­no­my always have to be stu­di­ed tog­e­ther.

Today, “infor­ma­li­ty” and the infor­mal sphe­re of the eco­no­my are still very pre­sent in our deba­tes, most recent­ly after the Covid-19-shocks that cau­sed a dra­stic reduc­tion of for­mal employment in many eco­no­mies.

I have seen two ways, in which the con­cept is put to work

On the one hand, the infor­mal eco­no­my con­tri­bu­tes to the liveli­hoods of the poor – working with the resour­ces at your dis­po­sal and respon­ding to the dearth of employment in the for­mal eco­no­my. This dimen­si­on abso­lut­e­ly needs to enter into the frame­works of deve­lo­p­ment poli­ci­es, and inde­ed it has infor­med many of tho­se poli­ci­es over the last deca­des.

On the other hand, given the lack of regu­la­ti­on, social secu­ri­ty, work­place safe­ty in the infor­mal eco­no­my, poli­cy-makers often cal­led for regu­la­ti­on, effec­tively a “for­ma­lizati­on” of the infor­mal sphe­re. This can refer to busi­ness per­mits, taxes, safe­ty at the work place, access to cre­dit, and many other things.

Keith Hart has the last word.

“I had no ambi­ti­on to coin a concept…I meant my eth­no­gra­phy to per­sua­de deve­lo­p­ment eco­no­mists to aban­don the unem­ployment model. More was going on in the grass­roots eco­no­my than they ima­gi­ned.”

Refe­ren­ces

Hart, K.

1973. Infor­mal inco­me oppor­tu­ni­ties and urban employment. Jour­nal of Modern Afri­can Stu­dies. Pp. 61–89.

2022. Self in the World. Con­nec­ting Life’s Extre­mes. New York: Berg­hahn Books. Pp. 98–100.

“I had no ambition to coin a concept…I meant my ethnography to persuade development economists to abandon the unemployment model. More was going on in the grassroots economy than they imagined.”
Keith Hart
British anthropologist